The election of the House of Councillors is finally coming in this month in Japan.
The approval rate for the current government is less than 30% that cannot have seen in recent years. It seems that the number is predicting the change of the party to lead Japan, but it may not mean the change.
Opposite party, Democratic Party, has not been approved by citizens enough. The supporting rate for the Democratic Party is said to be around 16 % according to the article of Asahi newspaper today.
A number of citizens do not support any party… Distrust for the politics seems to be getting deep and deep. However, in the next election, those who voted for the ruling party in the last election may stop to vote for it because of a series of ridiculous failures and problems such as pension or improper words of cabinet members.
Citizens' feeling may be like: LDP cannot do anything though Democratic Party is not reliable, either. However, taking what's been going under LDP into consideration, Japan's society has been going worse for general citizens. If so, just let the opposite party try to lead this country.
For citizens, no choice. Anyways, citizens want politicians to think about general citizens seriously and hope that the politicians stop enjoying a "party" being held somewhere underground.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
hello Shogo
The "party" being held somewhere underground is more than just a fuzzy feeling, IT IS REAL.
In the usa the biggests political parties happen in bohemian groove
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove
and what wikipedia is too shy to tell about are the orgies, both hetero and homosexuals that goes on
in there once there are finish with their "cave age rituals" and private conferences.
There are many books, movies and clips about all of that stuff.
In his book "Men and Powers", Helmut Schmidt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Schmidt
reveals that he prefers the parties at bohemian groove over their own they do in Germany.
Even the general public that gets brainwash daily by the big medias can get in touch with this type on information
indirectly when it percolates through, such as the last movie of Stanley Kubrick, Eyes Wide Shut.
In the movie, there is a party (orgie) organised by the local "big shots" with a primitive ceremony and all.
It is hard to tell if Kubrick just mimic bohemian groove or if it is a correct replica of a "less important"
bunch of political big shots in U.K. having their own parties. And yes, i even saw a J. movie with similar "parties"
where Renji Ishibashi plays the role of a powerfull old man in hana to hebi. Writers do not create 100% of
what they write from scratch, they take from what they know, from their surroundings and what they learn
from others and so on... Reality percolates through and shows up in their books and movies.
Sometimes, important informations percolate through ahead of time.
There is (was?) a foolish tv show called "the x files" about space aliens
and other gomi and one of the writers made of mock of "the new american" magazine
(if i recall correctly) with three unimportant characters called "the lone gunmen" inside
the x files, and later they made a tv show just about "the lone gunmen", and inside this lone
gunmen show, the first episode, the pilot episode, they were "very inspired" (almost a cut & paste)
by one of those so called "lunatic magazine" they used to steal ideas from, and this is how they came up
with the first episode of the lone gunmen. It aired at the beggining of 2001, about six
months ahead of 9/11. The first episode is about the military industrial complex in need
of a new ennemy because the cold war is over and they have to keep going on with the
massive military budget, so they create the new ennemy: terrorists. The state's terrorists
are plotting to crash a plane in new york, the lone gunmen cannot find a bomb inside the
plane and they realise that the plane itselft is the bomb and the plane is going to crash
in the world trade center, to impress the public and get more military funding. Enough
funding to make many parties, or orgies! Of course, in that tv show the hero the plane from
crashing at the very last moment.
This is supposed to be a coincidence.
Just like the fact that those terrorist attacks of british nightclubs were warned a few weeks ago by police that
they were potential targets for car bombers. An advice booklet for bars, pubs and nightclubs was
produced by the security services and included a section on "vehicle borne improvised explosive devices".
This is supposed to be a coincidence.
The seven seven (the nickname britons gave to july 7th, 2005) killings were possible because security
stood down in the attack: they were having a drill about an identical terrosist attack at the same time.
The terror drill that just happened to be running on the morning of July 7th planned for
the scenario of simultaneous bombs exploding on tubes at precisely the stations that were involved.
This is supposed to be a coincidence.
They could not asked them "please don't do your job that day and let us do our self inflicted wound".
The only way they could do it, was to do a drill for an identical terrosist attack at the same time so that
they would be totally confused and be successfull to kill their own citizens.
http://www.officialconfusion.com/77/
http://www.officialconfusion.com/77/mindthegap/Google/mindthegap.html
A few months before 9/11 (may 8th 2001), Dick Cheney got himself the power over the air security
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/05/20010508.html
to make sure they would not stop the attack that was coming ahead: the day of 9/11, there were
doing operation "Vigilant Guardian" to have 99% of the military planes far away in Canada
http://www.oilempire.us/norad.html
This is supposed to be a coincidence.
There is a futur coincidence that can be seen ahead, important parts of the documents are #4, #6 and #11d:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
The president give himself the power to declare martial law (an rule like a dictator) at will.
The "Continuity of Government" is what was referred in the cold war as the parallel government
that was to keep the country going on if the president and all political men were to be killed
by a nuclear blast. The last man on earth that should have control over the continuity of government
is the president himself (this would be like a 100 volt robot plugged in the electrical wall outlet and
the robot is programmed to pull the plug from the wall, killing himself). The fact that W Bush gave
himselft power over the entity he should NOT have control over is to make the entity do the oposite
of what it is supposed to do. Just like Dick Cheney did in may 8th 2001.
Now, to make sense of all of this, you should not look at the tree, but stand back and look at the whole forest.
This is all about the peak oil crisis and to view it from the point of view of W Bush you have to read this 1957
speach from an american military about peak oil and the end of civilisation:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2724#more
For the american empire, oil is the blood. Peak oil means economic crash and civil war.
For any american president, it would be an absolute priority it avoid economic crash and civil war at all cost.
It means 1: you have to police your country, 2: you have to get more oil.
With the 9/11 self inflicted wound they passed the "patriot act" that reduce civil liberties and gave
the autorities greats powers. With the 9/11 self inflicted wound they got more control over the oil of Iraq with the war.
1: How could W Bush get more police power again? By declaring martial law, but W Bush need a pretext, he cannot
talk to the nation and say he's declaring martial law because that morning he got out of the bed angry.
A terrorist attack of the same magnitude of 9/11 would not be enough either, it needs to be MUCH BIGGER than
9/11 to declare martial law.
2: How could W Bush get more oil? By going to war with Iran. The american military is already overstretch in Iraq, so
i could they control the oil of Iran at the same time they do in Iraq? By using nuclear weapons. If they nuke Iran
with neutron bombs than can control both the oil of Iran and Iraq, but W Bush need a pretext, he cannot nuke Iran
just for the oil. The pretext needs to be MUCH BIGGER than oil.
Could both 1 and 2 get solved with the same pretext? Yes it can. W Bush can create a third pearl harbor
by bombing his own country with a small nuclear weapon and blame it on al queda (as usual), declare martial law
to get total military power, let the FBI fabricate links from a patsy to Iran and say Iran gave the bomb to
the patsy al queda terrorist, blame Iran for the third pearl harbor as a nuclear pretext and use his new
total military power to nuke Iran with neutron bombs and control the oil. Both goals can be achieve with
the same self inflicted wound.
All those recent bogus self inflicted terror attacks are to impress and prepare the mind of the population
for the third pearl harbor.
W Bush will be seen from the outside as the new Adolf Hitler and for the insiders with knowledge of
the peak oil crisis, he'll be seen as the savior. No matter how crazy it may seems, W Bush thinks
he is saving the american empire by killing his own citizens to manipulate world events.
We are living in interesting times.
Important history is being written right now, right under our eyes.
This will be the PARTY from HELL.
仕方がない
Marc
The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden.
It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him.
--George W. Bush, September 13, 2001
I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care.
It's not that important. It's not our priority.
--George W. Bush, March 13, 2002
Thank you very much for the interesting and deep story as always.
The story about the Bohemian Club was more interesting than Comedy Club though it is a true story. In addition, thanks a lot for making big fun in the punch line using a critical keyword "仕方ない" for the current government of Japan. It was hotter than "hot dog" topic.
The comment about the movie (it seems that you like movies a lot.) was interesting, too. The process that the movie is made will be sort of reflection of the reality as you said. I can strongly agree with that point.
I am also quite doubtful about 9/11, and after reading your comment, it's almost changing to a certainty though I don't want to believe so because I can never imagine the person who can kill massive people, especially, own country's citizens for profits given to a barbarous minority.
I suppose that even American citizens start to be aware of the strange coincidences. If the coincidences take place continuously, they are no more coincidence. People will notice that they are plans.
Well, though I like America a lot mostly, I feel pretty terrible thinking that because of Bush or America, over many decades, people in the world have "been laden".
Finally, I want to tell you that I laughed a lot about the change of the comments by Bush that you wrote in the final line. I think that because he sticks to oils too much, his mouth is getting slippy.
Shogo
hello Shogo
Your reaction is normal, denial is the first stage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
and so do all people.
There is about 70 millions americans in doubts about 9/11, knowing the government is hiding something. In New York the numbers (%) are much higher and they know more about it, because they saw it, all those policemen and firemen saw and heard all the bombs inside the towers. The last man to exit the north tower alive was William Rodriguez, he was a maintenance worker at the world trade center
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294
and he tells about what he witnessed
just last week, people in Illinois witness another coincidence: the beeping sounds of emergency transmission that interrupted their tv and radio shows. at the end of every radio and tv antenna transmitters there is a "bypass" for emergency transmission in place since the cold war, in case of an attack. there was a test in Illinois last week and the public heard the beeps and those employes in tv/radio station could read that the president was about to talk to the nation, etc. later it was said this was just a test that went wrong and that it was not supposed to really go "on air". i can no longer beleive in all those coincidences, and this "test that went wrong" makes me think that Chicago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windy_City,_Origin_of_Name_(Chicago)
is the most likely city to be hit in Illinois because the winds would be ideal to scare the population with the radioations of a miniature bomb. this is the most likely the next "dog and pony show" by the american administration
you might have noticed that Vladimir Poutin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poutine#Poutine_in_politics
visited both Bush, son and father, in Maine this week
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennebunkport,_Maine
and they said publicly that they (Usa and Russia) agreed on an identical political position about Iran. what i can "read between the lines" is that if the Usa choose to attack Iran for whatever reason, Russia would stand still and not opposed the Usa and not start a world war
for Bush, this is about saving is country from the catastrophic results of peak oil, not about making is friends rich, he is doing it "for the good of the country". of course, this will make him look like a modern version of Adolf Hitler, just like in 1939 when Hitler secretly made a deal with Russia to invade Poland so that both country would have their share of Poland and then Germany invaded them after staging an even as a pretext to make war
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Poland_%281939%29
this time, this is Iran instead of Poland.
world events do not happen by themselves, they are staged
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleiwitz_incident
or
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mukden_Incident
there were, they are and they will be staged...
history repeats hitself.
innocent arabic people are and will "be laden" as nothing will stop the american military, and of course nothing will stop the rest of the world to have a bad image of america unless they are naive enough to beleive all the "dog and pony shows" created by the professional communication companies working for the government
understanding the genuine catastrophic effect of peak oil on america is key in understanding Bush and his actions, of course, understanding does not mean you have to agree with, but nevertheless you have to see it from his point of view
yes, i have seen so many movies you would hardly beleive it, when i was a small kid i was skipping school to watch on tv those movies rated #1 (chef d'oeuvre) that nobody liked and wondered why the best rated movies were so disliked by the average people
Marc
In a world of universal deceipt, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
--George Orwell, 1984
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2007-07/06/content_912170.htm
Food vs fuel wars just beginning
By Gioietta Kuo (China Daily)
Updated: 2007-07-06 16:21
As everyone in China knows, food prices have risen sharply over the past
year. If it gives any comfort to anyone, China is not the only country.
Rising food prices are a worldwide phenomenon.
The story goes back to the days after World War II. The Western
industrial nations went about developing their economy at a fast pace.
The basis for this development was cheap oil. From 1945 all the way to
the present day, cheap oil seemed to be a bonanza with no end in sight.
As a consequence of cheap oil, the society that developed was based on
the internal combustion engine - the motor car. Even though some
Americans have been aware of oil running out sometime in the future, the
country still consumes oil as if the supply will last forever.
In the US, transport is based on the individual automobile rather than
public transport like subways, trains. Even freight is carried by large
trucks instead of trains.
Petroleum is fundamental to our modern life. From oil we make plastics,
fertilizers, medicine and chemicals. We burn oil to produce electricity.
When countries like China and India began to industrialize, the global
scene changed because of increasing demand for oil.
In 2005, easily extracted oil from the oilfields peaked. From now on,
the flow will be at a reduced rate, eventually running dry. Oil
extracted from the more difficult oilfields, requiring more technology
and consequently more expense, is expected to peak in four years,
according to some experts in the United Kingdom. Since the global demand
for oil exceeds supply, oil prices are going to continue rising.
In the US, there is growing awareness that the country should not depend
on foreign oil from unstable regions like the Middle East. More
importantly investors have realized there is profit to be made by
converting corn into ethanol which can be used as motor fuel.
As more and more ethanol production distilleries come on line, 30
percent of the US corn harvest next year will go into ethanol production.
The US is the world's biggest grain producer and exporter. Almost 70
percent of all the grain imported by many nations around the world comes
from the US.
So there is direct competition between the 800 million people who own
automobiles and the world's poorest 2 billion. Basically there is now a
link between the food industry and the energy industry.
When the market sees that it is more profitable to produce ethanol than
sell the grain for food, the food industry will be in trouble. Since
ethanol is used as a fuel, its price will be tied to the price of oil.
As oil prices climb because of the impending world shortage of oil,
ethanol prices will rise. As a consequence food prices will rise as well.
China also has an ethanol industry. It was basically started by Western
investors who sought to profit by China's corn and the relatively cheap
labor as the global price of oil climbs. The Chinese government has been
quick to recognize the danger of diverting corn into ethanol. It has
said that in view of the food shortage, ethanol production has no place
in the Chinese economy.
How should governments proceed in what is a free market economy? The
chief remedy is to reduce government subsidies to the ethanol industry.
This seems difficult in the US Congress because of vested interests such
as farmers who grow corn.
We are already seeing urban protests in countries such as Indonesia,
Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria and Mexico. In Mexico, 75,000 people have taken
to the streets forcing the government to initiate price controls on
corn-based tortillas, their staple food.
It does not take a leap of imagination to see that continuing down the
path of corn for fuel will lead to worldwide famine affecting billions
of people. This will certainly lead to political instability, social
unrest and general chaos.
The picture is not complete if we do not mention another major reason
for the global rise in food prices. That is the fast growth of the world
population.
More people means more mouths to feed. It is obvious that when the
growth of population outstrips the capacity of the world to produce food,
famine is the inevitable result.
We have to give every incentive to reduce the world's population right
now. The world's population presently stands at 6.5 billion. It is
projected to grow to 8.2 billion by 2030 and 9 billion in 2050.
How are we going to feed these additional people when there is already
hunger in the world?
This is the most urgent problem humanity has yet faced. Unless we solve
this problem, all the other problems such as global warming, water
shortages, oil running out will become irrelevant.
There are two important questions at issue here. The first is a moral
question: Should we deprive many less developed countries of food just
so that we in the industrial countries in the West can have our pleasure
rides? Second, a much more important question is: Can the world afford
the destabilization - economic, political and social - that is sure to
follow from a starving populace?
The author Gioietta Kuo is advisor and senior fellow at the American Center for International Policy Studies
Hi Marc. Thanks a lot for your comment that is always interesting! And I'm sorry to respond a bit late, but I've read surely your comment.
As for the 9/11, I could totally understand that it was a plot. The comment of the witness who had been a janitor in World Trade Center for 20 years (in my memory) was telling a truth clearly.
I read your interesting comment spending a bit time every time. So, I'm sorry if I respond late to your comment. Especially this time, I want to read carefully the part after Illinois. I just confirmed that there was "ill noise".
Have a nice evening and night,
Shogo
hello Shogo
Yes, 20 years, and there are other shorter interviews by William Rodriguez where he gives more details about the empty floor that had activity noises and so on. A datacenter operator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_center
told how they had a power interruption for the whole building a week before 9/11 and that the next morning there was a fine layer of concrete dust deposited everywhere because it came from the air ventilation system, a first ever. As if peoples had made many drillings in the concrete of the building the night before.
This is supposed to be a coincidence.
And the security company that had the security contract for WTC was owned by
... (drum roll) ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeb_Bush
There are many coincidences.
This would not be possible if the mass media were not controlled by a small group of power mad people, and if they were honest, they would not omit important facts and the population could see the whole picture without distortion. During the first world war, the big bankers were not successfull to convince the american population to go die in France for the british empire, so J.P. Morgan Jr
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._P._Morgan%2C_Jr.
bought the 25 most influential newspapers in the Usa to control them, later, when the Lusitania affair and the Zimmermann Telegram
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimmermann_Telegram
append, they where exploited with many omissions and distortions by the mass media, or maybe i should write the "mess media", as their real goal is to omit facts the big boss wants to hide to steer the public in the direction he wants.
Sometimes you no longer have to "read between the lines", you just have to read the lines! That's preparing the public mind for the third pearl harbor because they need to attack Iran and turn the Usa into a full-fledged fascist state:
『
and they also understand that between now and November,
a lot of things are going to happen,
and I believe that by this time next year,
the American public's going to have a very different view of this war,
and it will be because, I think, of some unfortunate events,
that like we're seeing unfold in the UK.
But I think the American public's going to have a very different view,
and part of it will be the education that these three men will be
imparting on the American public during the course of this campaign.
』
So, this means they will generate the third pearl harbor and these 3 guy's job is to brainwash the public. Now you can see the true purpose of a political man! This futur event will be so horrible that the american public will desire the war with Iran, just like the power mad people want, sitting behind the scenes, pulling the strings of W Bush and other politicians. Now if you look back a the previous comments made by Vladimir Putin, especially about the Usa being the modern version of the third reich, you can see that all the other heads of states certainly know about this staged event to come. An event that sho ga nai and i wonder if Fumio Kyuma is in the know about it. As the former minister of defence, he must have been in the know, and if this is the case, it might have had an influence on him.
『
Having likened America to the Third Reich and lambasted Mr Bush as a danger to the planet
』
http://www.economist.com/world/international/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9441350
http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/Transcript_Page.aspx?ContentGuid=bd02aa0e-7953-414b-89ff-64db473685bc
Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum on his former colleagues' increasing lack of resolve on the war.
The Hugh Hewitt Show 7-7-07 at 12:48 AM
HH: We begin first with one of our favorite Americans, Rick Santorum, long time Senator from Pennsylvania, now in a number of different roles. Senator Santorum, always a pleasure to talk to you, sir.
RS: Great to be with you again, Hugh. How are you doing?
HH: Good. I thought of you today because your colleagues in the Senate, your former colleagues, including Pete Domenici, Richard Lugar, George Voinovich and John Warner are going south on the war, and I know when you were in the Senate, you were one of the principal advocates for a strong forward policy. What is going on with your friends and your former colleagues?
RS: Well, you know, it’s a combination of things. First, from the standpoint of Lugar and Voinovich, the first two, they’re both on the Foreign Relations Committee. Both of them deal extensively, unfortunately, with our State Department. And you know, I think the State Department has very much a defeatist attitude right now. They’re in full ‘let’s just negotiate this thing away, and we can talk to our enemies who vow to kill us and destroy is, whether it’s Iran or the al Qaeda in Iraq, or whatever the case may be.’ It’s a very defeatist attitude there, and it’s infecting not only Voinovich and Lugar, but I believe it’s infecting the administration. And we’ve seen, in my opinion, a lack of resolve of this administration to really go out there and identify the enemy, and confront the enemy with the clarity we need to win this war. And look, once the leaders begin to fall, then others will fall. And I think Domenici’s in a tough race in New Mexico, Warner is in a similar situation here in Virginia. So I mean it’s not a pleasant scene when you see politics start to enter into the situation where people begin trying to cut their losses and get out when the getting gets good.
HH: But Senator Santorum, I know that you stayed tough throughout a very tough race, even though your opponent was not taking any position that anyone could go after him. Pete Domenici, you know, he’s got a 51% approval rating, which isn’t very healthy. I can’t imagine that the Republican base is going to applaud this. Do you think they’re just going to sit back and say that’s fine, he can desert the President on the war, and we will still support him?
RS: I’ve got to tell you, I’m very disappointed, and disappointed in all four of those, my former colleagues. They should know better. In fact, they do know better. They know that this is a very serious threat, they know that if we are to withdraw our troops and stop resisting their attempts to conquer that region of the world, that they will soon end up on our doorstep. If we didn’t learn anything from the events of 9/11, certainly the Islamists’ attempts of attacking our European allies, particularly the UK, should give us some pause that these people will prey on weakness. They saw the transition of power from Tony Blair to Gordon Brown, and they saw the appeasement of the Brits of trying to, you know, get out of the Middle East and get the troops withdrawn. And so what was their response? They stepped up their terror attacks. I mean, you have to understand, they don’t think like we do. They don’t see people reaching out saying let’s work and compromise, and let’s try to find meaningful middle ground as anything but weakness. They will exploit that weakness by going after you. And so learn lessons. Don’t learn the lessons you learned growing in your own neighborhood, because they’re not growing up in those neighborhoods. They’re growing up in very different neighborhoods with very different worldviews, and responses to different stimuli. We need to understand that, and we need to react accordingly.
HH: Now Rick Santorum, obviously, you had to have watched in some amazement as your colleagues also got the immigration bill completely backwards. One of my great friends in the Senate, one of your great friends, too, Jon Kyl’s going to be on, talking with me about that after the break. But it leads me to conclude, is there something about serving in the Senate that gets people away from the folks who sent them there? What is it?
RS: Well, first off, I saw your piece on Jon Kyl, and I thought it was a really terrific and classy piece. I know you and Jon disagree on the immigration issue, but I think you recognize Jon is a stand up guy…
HH: Yup.
RS: And I think Jon ultimately, on this particular bill, got it wrong. But I think overall, he’s gone a lot to move the bill in the right direction, and he’s doing his best to try to get as good a bill as possible. And so you understood that, and I appreciate your fairness in dealing with him on that issue. They did get it wrong, though, and you know, it is amazing. I went out, in my campaign in 2006, and I heard it clearly from the voters that they just had no faith in the people in charge in Washington, D.C. to uphold the laws that we currently have, and so they’re not going to give you any leeway to create new laws that they’re not going to uphold, particularly when it gives those who are in this country the right to stay here indefinitely because of the new statute. So we need to learn lessons. And we should have learned them during 9/11, and we should respond accordingly. We should also learn them from the standpoint of prior immigration bills, and take those lessons, and move them forward, and understand we have to solve the border problem first. We don’t solve that problem, nothing else is going to happen.
HH: Now I’ll let you go soon, Rick Santorum, but one more question. Have you seen the presidential candidates on our side doing what needs to be done? Are you happy with the quality of the arguments that Giuliani and Romney and Fred Thompson are making about the war and about the need for seriousness? Are you confident that they will continue to make those arguments?
RS: You know, I’ve talked to all three of the major candidates, that I think will be the major candidates, and that’s Giuliani, Romney and Thompson. I think those will be the three major candidates when we head into the final analysis. And I think all of them understand the issue very, very well, they understand particularly the importance of Iran, and confronting Iran in the Middle East as an absolute lynchpin for our success in that region, and I think they are committed to that. And while it may not be a popular thing to talk about right now, and I know public sentiment is against it, they understand the importance of the national security of this country, and they also understand that between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public’s going to have a very different view of this war, and it will be because, I think, of some unfortunate events, that like we’re seeing unfold in the UK. But I think the American public’s going to have a very different view, and part of it will be the education that these three men will be imparting on the American public during the course of this campaign.
HH: I hope you’re right. Rick Santorum, boy, we miss you in the Senate, but I’m glad you’re saying in the public square and swinging from the hips on this one, and I appreciate it very much. Rick Santorum, always a pleasure. Thank you, Senator.
RS: Thanks, Hugh.
HH: We really did do ourselves a nightmarish disservice, Pennsylvania, to the whole country when you let that guy get out, one of the most serious, bright thinkers in American politics, doing what had to be done.
End of interview.
Marc
If a person, or organisation, starts to play on your fears,
it may be that person or organisation that you should fear.
i made two typos, i wrote append but i meant happend, as you can see, my english is phonetical; and i got the wrong Bush, it is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Bush
and is Securacom/Stratesec company
the french deputy Christine Boutin dare to publicly admit that W Bush MIGHT be reponsible for 9/11,
she is the first political person to go that far in "the west"
http://www.reopen911.info
and William Rodriguez will be in Paris 2007/07/11
http://www.reopen911.info/11-septembre/le-11-juillet-2007reopen911-invite-william-rodriguez/
this one is the most complete yet, in 50 minutes
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8677389869548020370
Hi Marc. Thanks a lot for telling me the big story in detail. I start to get a whole picture and understand what's going on and was going on.
The truth that has begun to be uncovered in front of us is chilly. After figuring it out, so many things taught in school, company, society or etc start to look dubious.
I already know that what happened in UK is far from a coincidence. It'll be one of the shows for a next development that nobody wants to see except for some.
I wonder what's going to happen if a certain number of people, especially in America come to know totally what the government has been doing.
Thanks always and have a nice day,
Shogo
hello Shogo
There are people who understand completely what is going on, especially in N.Y. and Texas, but FEMA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEMA
and other federal agencies are prepared for it, they hire as much policemen as they can, in Texas they have large outdoor advertising billboards to hire more policemen.
The citizens all have different degree of understanding, how much of them can see the full picture is impossible to tell, but as social unrest gets bigger, there will be more violent police activities to maintain order and it's only then, when it will be too late, that they see that is was all about peak oil and keep control of their own country and to avoid the desintegration.
The interesting part will be how many federal policemen have, or will have, a full knowledge of what is really going on, and the moral issue it will rise when they see other policemen jailling their brother and similar stuff, you know, like the Tiananmen square in China, a single person stopping a row of tanks because he is talking to his relative in the tank, they had to get military from other prefectures where they speak Qin or other different chinese languages to nail them down. This is when those mexican policemen will be usefull.
The one basic lie that people cannot see yet, is they naively think that their government care about them, while in fact they don't. They are good at taxing you and good to lie to you about how a good job they do, while the citizens of New Orleans saw how ineffective fema was:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_of_Hurricane_Katrina_on_New_Orleans
it could be liken to the Hanshin earthquake and how "efficient" the J government was to rescue and help their own citizens. Vote for me, gambarimasu! (giggle)
The root of the word government is obvious in french:
gouvernement: gouverne / ment
gouverne: to govern, to rule
ment: mentir, to lie, to deceipt.
So, a government rule you and lie to you, that is the meaning of the word in french.
Each time you see their propaganda about man made global warming (instead of sun made global warming), just replace the words global warming by peak oil and the lie will be transformed into truth. So called "man made global warming" is just a scarecrow to make citizens reduce their use of oil based energy, although using less oil is good, it is extremely disturbing to see that they always lie about everything.
Notice they don't tell about peak oil, but they act on it, everything they say is a lie, so forget what they say and look a what they do. Notice the J authorities are going all electrical because electricity is not energy itselft, but a way to transport energy, so that they can swap or diversify their energy sources, and how much more coal they use now... So, you better go all electrical and get rid of those gaz canisters to heat your house because an al queda terrorist could use that canister to blow up a car in UK! (giggle)
...
But this is not funny.
The decline of oil is the decline of the american empire.
They are ruthless and ready to kill anything or anybody standing in their way.
There are a few movies in the making right now about all of that stuff, and i really hope they can finish and start distribution BEFORE the third pearl harbor happens, because after it, i expect them to declare martial law and jail anybody they want at will, for like: distributing DVDs about a suject they don't like.
Marc
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.
--Adolf Hitler
The great mass of people will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one.
--Adolf Hitler
Bonjour Marc. Thanks a lot for your comment again. The definition of government in French was quite persuasive.
I think that younger generations who can be called "internet generations" start to be keenly aware of the deceit of government. So many dirty truths that traditional media do not pick up are spreading around the internet.
It seems that Live Earth concert that appealed "global warming" in MSN was quite successful collecting more than 10 million streams. It is a really big industry already.
Have a nice day,
Shogo
hello Shogo
I'm too old to be included in that generation and i do not visit "youth web sites" per say, so i would not be able to evaluate how much % of the internet generation is interested by the real power structure of society instead of frivolous topics like paris hilton or the latest rammstein mp3 (or whatever) on their ipod, but yes, there are really young men keenly aware they are living in a key moment of history.
I first heard of Luke Rudkowski when i found his great video about Zbigniew Brzezinski
Posted: Monday, April 23, 2007
Brzezinski NWO Scum
http://www.wearechange.org/archives/2007_04_01_archive.html
That young man got into that kind of activism because his girlfriend had a relative that died in 9/11, he doesn't see the full picture but he is really close to see it and he is brave enough to face the "main actors" of 9/11. He got anonymous death threats for weeks, he got arrested by cops; and when he got first hand testimony form Larry Silverstein's employees
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein
that L.S. always went to the 107th floor of WTC1 to eat but that on 9/11 he got a phone call NOT to go to the WTC and then he called his daughter to leave the WTC, etc. Then, about 36 hours after he made these employees testimony public, the newspaper n.y.times got a big article in the first pages about L.S. that he was lucky that his wife forced him to go see a doctor that day, and so on. The public, totally unaware of what goes on, read the newspaper that day about L.S.'s alibi, not aware they are being brainwash and feed a bogus alibi. It was quite comical, but funnier yet, was his confrontation of Gergen.
Posted: Monday, June 18, 2007
WeAreChange Confronts Joe Biden, Bill Richardson & David Gergen
Gergen has been part of bohemian grove's homosexual camp since mid-1970's and has been taped and recorded saying being there and such. The comical part is gergen asking Luke to go with him at bohemian grove (suggestively, if you can read between the lines), and when Luke ask him if he worships molek, he gets really angry and tell him "better get your facts straight", because he can no longer deny bohemian grove as he asked him to go to bohemian grove with him a few seconds before. That was really hilarious. You'll never see that kind of stuff in the mass media.
Marc
All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;
the point is to discover them. --Galileo Galilei
Hi Marc. Thanks a lot for the interesting story. I understand that it's a matter of time for majority of people to know the truth that 9/11 was a "convenient truth" created for a few people with lots of sacrifices.
And thanks for a good phrase:
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;
the point is to discover them. --Galileo Galilei"
This phrase will hit deeply Japan soon, too. Many purulent matters are blowing out.
Post a Comment